Florida Supreme Court Issues New Rules Governing AI Usage
The Florida Supreme Court, on its own motion, Amended the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration to address the increasing trend of hallucinated AI-generated case citations in court filings. Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(d)(2) now requires the signer of a document filed in Florida court to certify that "the legal authorities identified exist and are accurately cited". Courts are authorized to sanction parties who file any documentation inconsistent with this certification, which may include "reprimand, contempt, striking of the document, dismissal of proceedings, costs, attorneys' fees, or other sanctions". Id.
The amendment is meant to combat both the "demonstrated risks of generative AI" and to "promote the accuracy and integrity of court filings". In re Amendments to Florida
Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515, No. SC2026-0673 (Fla. May 28, 2026). In an administrative order issued concurrently with the ruling, the Court acknowledged judicial circuits throughout the state have adopted similar orders and opined that a "statewide approach to AI-related disclosure and certification would better balance the needs of the court system with the interests of the external users of that system". In re: Representations by Signers of Filings, Administrative Order No. AOSC26-12 (Fla. May 28, 2026).
The amendments to Rule 2.140 take effect June 15, 2026.











